Legal Opinion

Mangione v. Braverman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 9, 1964No. [No. 250, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This appeal followed the action of the trial court in sustaining a demurrer to the declaration of the appellant Mangione, seeking to recover the value of his services to the defendants, the appellees here, and monies advanced on their behalf, on the ground that the agreement for the breach of which suit was filed was unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds because (a) an essential part of it was a parol promise of two of the defendants to deed land (on which a building was to be erected) and (b) performance by Mangione would not, in a suit at law, serve to take the contract out of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. ThirstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  2. Small v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  3. Fairfax Forrest Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Stevens v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Bright v. GanasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mogavero v. SilversteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. New Baltimore City Board of School CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Lipscomb v. HessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Kline v. LightmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Campbell v. WelshCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API