Legal Opinion

Walker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 10, 2008No. C 07-03772 WHAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PROPOUNDING INTERROGATORY TO DEFENDANT METLIFE

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this disability-benefits action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, plaintiff David Walker sued defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and the Kaiser Permanente Flexible Benefits Plan for denying his claim for long-term disability benefits. The proper standard of review for MetLife’s claim determination is abuse of discretion. A necessary factor in the abuse of discretion analysis is MetLife’s undisputed structural conflict of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Vicki Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Hoskins v. BAYER CORP. AND BUS. SERVICES LONG TERMDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
  2. Bledsoe v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API