Legal Opinion
the University of Houston v. Stephen Barth
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided August 25, 2011No. 01-06-00490-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice.
Stephen Barth obtained a judgment awarding damages and attorney’s fees against the University of Houston (“University”) based on a jury’s finding that the University, Barth’s employer, had violated the Texas Whistleblower Act. 1 On original submission, we held that the University had waived its liability challenge to the judgment because it had failed to dispute all bases on which the jury could have found that the University violated the Whistleblower Act. 2
After our opinion issued, the Supreme Court of Texas decided State v. Lueck in which it held that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LueckTexas Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.