Legal Opinion
Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 27, 1992No. Court 85-04-00628PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
This action is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to Rule 15(a) 1 of the Rules of this Court, to amend its original complaint to include additional claims which allegedly came to light during discovery. Defendant opposes the motion on the grounds that plaintiff's attempt to amend is untimely and would unduly prejudice defendant’s ability to present its case.
Background
Plaintiff, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”), acted as corporate surety for Opera Garment Inc. (“Opera”), the importer of record, under two term bonds covering the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arthur Wayne Carson, Cross-Appellee v. Officer Polley, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- The Troxel Manufacturing Company, and Cross-Appellee v. Schwinn Bicycle Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Ruby International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.