Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1966No. 39274PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, life.

The indictment alleged that appellant, on or about the 5th day of July, 1964, “did with *736malice aforethought kill James Mason by-shooting him with a gun.”

Appellant moved to quash the indictment because of the absence of an allegation that he “voluntarily” killed the deceased.

This Court held in Crutchfield v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 420, 10 S.W.2d 119, that an averment that the killing was done “with malice aforethought” was sufficient, though the statute defining murder provides “whoever shall voluntarily kill any person within this state…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Crutchfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Nisbet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Hanes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Durrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Hinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Rivas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API