Legal Opinion

Clark v. Chapman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1921No. Docket No. 45PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Ottawa; Cross (Orien S.), J. ■ Bill by Jarrett N. Clark against Elizabeth Allen Chapman for the foreclosure of a pledge. From an order denying a motion to dismiss, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

Plaintiffs bill is filed to foreclose a pledge, consisting of a note secured by mortgage on land in North Dakota and held by him as collateral to *520a note given by defendant to a corporation in Chicago called the United Agency, and by it sold to plaintiff, who is a resident of Zeeland, Ottawa county, Michigan. Defendant resides in the city of Chicago, Illinois.

The bill of complaint introduces the subject with the information that prior to November 13, 1918, defendant Elizabeth Allen Chapman owed the United Agency, a corporation of Chicago, $4,950 which she reduced on that date to $2,549.75,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donohoe v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Richard v. BoydMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Cleghorn v. Minnesota Title Ins. & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Drake v. CloonanMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walner v. CapronIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Lightner v. KarnatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. National Ben Franklin Insurance v. Bakhaus Contractors, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Otte v. LandyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1956
  5. Queen v. FryerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API