Legal Opinion

Baugh v. Baugh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1915No. 1417Published

Error from Panola County Court; Geo. I-Harkrider, Judge. Action by C. V. Baugh against M. S. Baugh and R. S. Scoggins. Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant M. S. Baugh and for the defendant Scoggins against the plaintiff, and both plaintiff and defendant M. S. Baugh bring error.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

[3] The plaintiff in error, M. S. Baugh, has filed a motion for a rehearing, in which it is contended that the citation issued in this case and served upon him was defective and insufficient to support a judgment by default. The defect pointed out in the motion, and the same as that relied upon in the original presentation of the appeal, is the absence of the file number of the suit from, the body of the citation. An examination of the writ incorporated in the record shows that the place where the file number was intended to appear was left blank. It is also shown that the clerk…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. HempelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Duke v. SpillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Eaton v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API