Fox v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAGE, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Fox, was convicted on two counts oi! an indictment, the first of which charged that Yoelz, Fox, and others “to said grand jurors unknown” conspired to defraud a national bank.
Complaint is made that the first count of the indictment did not sufficiently advise defendant of the nature of the accusation. Although it is suggested that too many substantive offenses are included in a single count, the argument veers off to the proposition that the count is bad, because, although the grand jury knew one Schipper was one of the alleged conspirators, the count falsely…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Epstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. MelekhDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
- United States v. Central Supply Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941
- People v. WorkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954