Legal Opinion

Holton v. Whitney

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Ejectment for a piece of land in Putney. Plea, tlie general issue, and trial by jury, at tlie September Term, 1856, — Underwood, J., presiding.

Read the full summary

Ejectment for a piece of land in Putney. Plea, tlie general issue, and trial by jury, at tlie September Term, 1856, — Underwood, J., presiding. The plaintiff put in evidence a deed from David Leavitt to Mercy Steele, dated September 12, 1822, of a tract of land in Putney, containing forty acres, and also a deed of the same land from the administrator of Mercy Adams’ estate to the plaintiff, dated March 27 th, 1850. It appeared on trial that Mercy Steele, under whom the plaintiff claimed, was married to Daniel Adams in 1822, that Adams died in 1838, and his widow, Mercy, in 1849, Adams and his…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pierpoint, J.

The case shows that in April, 1828, Mercy Adams, the wife of Daniel Adams, and the person under whom the plaintiff claims title to the land in question, and Theophilus and David Crawford, the persons under whom the defendant claims title, were the owners of adjoining tracts of land; that Daniel Adams, by virtue of his rights as the husband of the said Mercy was in the possession and occupation of the tract owned by her, and that the Crawfords were in the occupation of the tract belonging to them; that prior to 1828, there had been no…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
  2. Mcnamee v. MorelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. George v. HoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Whitford v. CrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API