Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of De Nardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 9, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contestants appeal from two orders of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, which denied their motions for leave to amend their objections. Orders affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent Stephania De Nardo, payable out of the estate. In the first proposed amendment, appellants seek to plead an interlocutory judgment of annulment, rendered in the Supreme Court, New York County, annulling the marriage between the decedent and respondent De Nardo, his alleged widow, on the ground that decedent was a lunatic at the time of the marriage. This is immaterial. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Delafield v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of WidmayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. In re the Estate of SimpsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. Van Rensselaer v. AkinCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of TorrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  2. Estate of RinkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API