Valparaiso Technical Institute, Inc. v. Porter County Treasurer
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentChezem, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion concludes that a contingent fee cannot be imposed upon a third party without prior agreement and that the fee imposed here was unreasonable. I would agree in the context of private matters, where the collection agreement fees are between three willing interests, for instance: lender, borrower, and the collecting attorney. In a matter of delinquent tax collection, other interests are involved: treasurer, collecting attorney, delinquent taxpayer, and timely taxpayer. I decline to follow the Leibowitz, Berkemeier, and Waxman line of cases cited by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- White v. Porter County TreasurerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996