Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. Allen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

A bill was filed herein by complainant, Sarah Louis Cheatham et al., against Martha Foulks Allen et al., seeking to establish title to an interest in certain lands in Obion County. The Chancellor overruled all grounds of several demurrers filed.

In 1906, J. M. Foulks and wife conveyed to two of their sons, Leon and Jim Foulks, by three deeds made Exhibits 2, 3 and 4 to the bill, the lands in controversy. The question presented here arises out of the language contained in said deeds.

Exhibit 2, in part, is as follows:

“. . . do sell and convey to Leon Foulks and Jim Foulks, the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scruggs v. MayberryTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bransford Realty Co. v. AndrewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Anderson v. LucasTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Parkes v. CliftTennessee Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Harwell v. HarwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aclin v. SpeightCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  2. Boring v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hendrix v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  4. Cole v. WindleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API