Legal Opinion

William C. Atwater & Co. v. Bowers

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 9, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I direct a verdict in favor of the defendant in this case and judgment may be entered accordingly.

I. I think that there are only two questions involved in this case, both of which turn on the construction of documents.

■ The stipulation of facts has been amplified by the filing of documentary exhibits, which have been admitted in all cases without objection to their competency although as to some there have been objections as to materiality and relevancy. I overrule those objections and I accept all of those documents as exhibits so that we shall have a full record in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Lumber Co. v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  2. Remington-Rand, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  2. J. W. Sefton, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  4. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API