Legal Opinion
Stillman v. InService America Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 23, 2010No. 05 Civ. 6612(GWG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case raises the issue of whether prejudgment interest is mandatory or discretionary under New York law for a quantum meruit claim. For the reasons stated below, we hold that it is mandatory.
The parties consented to the disposition of this matter by the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and a jury trial was held beginning August 23, 2010, on plaintiffs claim for quantum meruit damages against defendants. On August 27, 2010, the jury rendered a verdict awarding plaintiff $132,724.00. Plaintiff now seeks…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Action S.A. And Deltamar Establishment v. Marc Rich & Co., Inc. And Marc Rich, Marc RichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Hudson View II Associates v. GoodenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart v. Albany Steel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Precision Foundations v. IvesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Maris Equipment Co. v. Morganti, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stillman v. Inservice America Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Kossoff v. FelberbaumDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Residential Fences Corp. v. Rhino Blades Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- TD Bank, N.A. v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020