Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Christensen, State Treas. v. Sikora

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1941No. 2195Published

1ConcurrenceBlume, J.

I concur in the result. I do so with some misgivings, on account of the fact that heretofore grocery stores have never been considered as coming within the. workmen’s compensation laws. But I am not able to say that the grocery department involved in the case at bar, which contained a power-driven coffee grinder, was not, under the statute as it was at the time of the accident herein, a room where “power-driven machinery is employed”. Sunshine Food Stores v. Moorehead, 153 Okl. 301, 5 P. (2d) 1066; Eckhardt v. Jones’ Market, 105 Or. 204, 209 P. 470. I doubt very seriously that the workman in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sunshine Food Stores v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Lunday v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Eckhardt v. Jones' MarketOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Leslie v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API