Legal Opinion

Raymond Parvin v. Clinchfield Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1980No. 78-1272PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity case, plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict entered by the District Court in favor of the defendant, Clinchfield Railroad Company. Plaintiff was injured while driving his automobile across a railroad crossing. The District Court concluded that plaintiff’s failure to see the train coming before the collision constituted contributory negligence under Virginia law barring recovery. We reverse and remand for trial.

I

The plaintiff and his family, who live in Illinois, were visiting the Stewarts at their farmhouse back off the main road in rural Scott…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EplingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  2. Virginian Railway Co. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. FletcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  4. Skinner v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estes v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  2. Syed v. M-I, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API