Legal Opinion
Kibel v. Appel
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided April 20, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louis B. York, J.
This amended decision cures several errors made in the previous decision dated March 27,1990.
This is a motion for summary judgment in a holdover proceeding seeking the eviction of a husband and wife for violating a substantial obligation of their lease. The tenant claims that this proceeding is flawed because prior to the bringing of this action and after the service of the 30-day notice the landlord furnished the tenant with a renewal lease *142on a form prescribed by the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal pursuant to Rent Stabilization Code (9…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stewart M. Muller Construction Co. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. LioneNew York District Court · 1971
- Atkinson v. TrehanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Kennedy v. DeignanNassau County District Court · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stepping Stones Associates v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Herman v. MerynCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
- Waterside Plaza, LLC v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Starrett City Inc. v. JeffreyCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005