Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Upon this appeal we think the judgment must be reversed in the interests of justice and to insure to the defendant a fair trial.
We disapprove of the practice adopted by the trial court at the close of the case in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.
At the close of the case, after both sides had rested, the record shows that the following occurred: “ Mr. Williamson: The defendant moves for the direction of a verdict upon the same grounds stated in the motion to dismiss Mr. Syme: I join n the motion for the direction of a verdict and ask the court to direct a verdict *462in favor of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- International Battery Co. v. WestreichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- McTiernan v. City of Little FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Washington Finance Corp. v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Grammer v. AlmondNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Herbstman v. LamoreeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- O'Brien v. TildenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.