Legal Opinion

Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon this appeal we think the judgment must be reversed in the interests of justice and to insure to the defendant a fair trial.

We disapprove of the practice adopted by the trial court at the close of the case in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

At the close of the case, after both sides had rested, the record shows that the following occurred: “ Mr. Williamson: The defendant moves for the direction of a verdict upon the same grounds stated in the motion to dismiss Mr. Syme: I join n the motion for the direction of a verdict and ask the court to direct a verdict *462in favor of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International Battery Co. v. WestreichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McTiernan v. City of Little FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Washington Finance Corp. v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Grammer v. AlmondNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Herbstman v. LamoreeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. O'Brien v. TildenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API