Francis Tucker v. Delta Regional Medical Center
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarlton, J.
¶17. I concur in part and dissent in part, and I would affirm the findings and judgment of the trial court. The récord reflects no abuse of discretion by the trial court, and we must therefore affirm the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice. See Cox v. Cox, 976 So.2d 869, 874 (¶ 11) (Miss.2008). The' Mississippi Supreme Court has established that on appeal, we review “a lower court’s decision not to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law on an abuse-of-discretion standard!,]” and the clear record of delay and dilatory ac*695tion on the face of the record in the present case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scoggins v. Ellzey Beverages, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Cox v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re SpencerMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Hillman v. WeatherlyMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Hensarling v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.