Legal Opinion

Miller v. Board of Regents of the University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoon, J.

The petitioners are doctors. They were convicted in the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia for contempt of Congress for the refusal to produce certain records before a Congressional committee. That offense is a misdemeanor, therefore a crime. (U. S. Code, tit. 2, § 192.) Their conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Barsky v. United States, 167 F. 2d 241), and certiorari was twice denied by the Supreme Court. (334 U. S. 843, petition for rehearing denied 339 U. S. 971.)

Subsequently the Board of Regents of the State of New…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  2. Matter of DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. People Ex Rel. Marks v. BrophyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of JohnsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  3. Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API