United States v. Biocic
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMALKIN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a petty offense conviction entered by United States Magistrate Laws of this Court, after a bench trial, on a charge of violation of 50 C.F.R. § 27.83 (1988), which makes punishable as a federal offense the commission, within national wildlife refuges, of “any act of indecency or disorderly conduct as defined by State or local laws.... ” The appellant does not dispute the underlying facts, so there is no need to review the proceedings at trial (fortunate, because the tape is inaudible); the appellant challenges only the legal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sdj, Inc., D/B/A Sugar Babes v. The City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Jeanine M. BiocicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jeanine M. BiocicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991