Legal Opinion

United States v. Biocic

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 2, 1990No. Crim. S 89-0494PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SMALKIN, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a petty offense conviction entered by United States Magistrate Laws of this Court, after a bench trial, on a charge of violation of 50 C.F.R. § 27.83 (1988), which makes punishable as a federal offense the commission, within national wildlife refuges, of “any act of indecency or disorderly conduct as defined by State or local laws.... ” The appellant does not dispute the underlying facts, so there is no need to review the proceedings at trial (fortunate, because the tape is inaudible); the appellant challenges only the legal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Sdj, Inc., D/B/A Sugar Babes v. The City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeanine M. BiocicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Jeanine M. BiocicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API