Legal Opinion

Tibbals v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error was indicted for making a false return to a writ of replevin as constable of tbe town of Port Washington.

Tbe plaintiff in error demurred to tbe indictment, but tbe demurrer was overruled, whereupon be pleaded not guilty, was tried, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $25 and costs.

Tbe charging part of tbe indictment is in tbe following words; *597said writ of replevin in bis possession, did knowingly, unlawfully, willfully and corruptly tben and there falsely return in writing upon said writ of replevin, that he had by virtue of said writ of replevin, on the 31st day…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. McCarthy v. Territory of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API