Legal Opinion

Tush-ho-Yo-Tubby v. Barr

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Circuit Court of Chickasaw county. Hon. Joel M. Acker, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover a tract of land located to plaintiff, as a reserve, by the treaty of the United States with the Chickasaw Indians. Plaintiff alleges that he left said land unoccupied in the year 1838, and that ever since he has been beyond the limits of the United States, to wit: In the territory known as Indian Territory, west of the State of Arkansas and east of the Rocky Mountains.

To this declaration the defendant demurred. 1. Generally, that the cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations. 2. Because, admitting that since 1838 plaintiff has resided in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MurrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Adams v. GuiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Nixon v. PorterMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Tegarden v. CarpenterMississippi Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Paxton v. Valley Land Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API