Village Taxi Corp. v. Beltre
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Leventhal, J.
A contract that violates municipal regulations which exist for the protection of public health or morals may be illegal and unenforceable (see Benjamin v Koeppel, 85 NY2d 549, 553 [1995]). On this appeal, which arises from the sale of the outstanding capital stock and assets of certain taxi companies located within the Village of Port Chester, we consider, among other things, whether the Supreme Court correctly determined that so much of the subject contract as pertains to the sale of certain taxicab licenses is unenforceable and against public policy,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Benjamin v. KoeppelNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Welsbach Elec v. Mastec N. AmNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Lloyd Capital Corp. v. Pat Henchar, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Charlebois v. J.M. Weller Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Galbreath-Ruffin Corp. v. 40th & 3rd Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ader v. GuzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Ropiecki v. RopieckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cherofsky v. CherofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Gevorkyan v. JudelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Healy v. KrugerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.