Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided July 1, 1994No. 70,485PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brazil, J.:
Leslie E. McIntosh appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and William F. Henry (Santa Fe). The district court found it had no jurisdiction to hear McIntosh’s claim of breach of implied contract because it was preempted by the Railway Labor Act (RLA), 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (1988), We affirm.
Santa Fe is an interstate carrier by rail and is a “carrier” under the RLA. McIntosh was an “employee” under the RLA. A collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing the terms and conditions of employment was in effect…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Potter v. Janus Investment FundDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- McIntosh v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RWY. CO.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- Mangold v. Analytic Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Mangold v. Analytic Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996