Legal Opinion
Arlen Whisenant v. Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided July 12, 2005No. W2004-01745-COA-R3-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 17, 2005 Session ARLEN WHISENANT v. BILL HEARD CHEVROLET, INC. A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-03-0589-2 The Honorable Arnold Goldin, Chancellor No. W2004-01745-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 12, 2005 Appellee brought suit against Appellant, a car dealership, after experiencing problems with purchased vehicle. Among other things, Appellee alleged fraud in the inducement. Appellant sought to enforce arbitration agreement in the contract for sale. The trial court ruled that, under Tennessee law, claims of fraud in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frizzell Construction Co. v. Gatlinburg, L.L.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Taylor v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- United Steelworkers of America, for Itself and on Behalf of Local 12943 v. The Mead Corporation, Fine Paper DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- City of Blaine v. John Coleman Hayes & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Gonzalez v. State Department of Children's ServicesTennessee Supreme Court · 2004