Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
Appellant was tried and convicted by a jury on April 7,1959 of robbery by assault. The jury found the enhancement paragraph true and assessed punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections for life. Appellant’s conviction was subsequently affirmed. Smith v. State, 168 Tex.Crim. 543, 330 S.W.2d 196 (1959). Following application for post conviction relief, the Court of Criminal Appeals granted an out-of-time appeal on the ground that he had been denied the right to counsel on appeal. We affirm.
In point of error one, appellant contends that he is…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gentry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Charles F. Satterfield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Daniel Eli Aranda A/K/A Daniel Aranda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Daniel Eli Aranda A/K/A Daniel Aranda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
- Daniel Eli Aranda A/K/A Daniel Aranda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.