Millard v. Alliance Laundry Systems, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Gorski and Pine, JJ.
(dissenting). We respectfully dissent and conclude that Supreme Court properly granted the motion *868“seeking an [o]rder granting [l]eave to [a]mend the [c]omplaint to assert direct causes of action against [third-party defendant Tramz Hotels, Inc., doing business as Holiday Inn (Tramz),] for spoliation and negligent impairment of [p]laintiff s claim.” Generally, “ ‘[l]eave to amend a pleading should be freely granted in the absence of prejudice to the nonmoving party where the amendment is not patently lacking in merit’ ” (McFarland v Michel, 2 AD3d 1297, 1300 [2003],…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- DiDomenico v. C & S Aeromatik Supplies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- MetLife Auto & Home v. Joe Basil Chevrolet, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
- McFarland v. MichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Letterman v. ReddingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.