Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Scheible

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 25, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, V. C.

Complainant’s bill is for the specific performance by defendant, as vendee, of a contract for the sale of certain lands at Asbnry Park, New Jersey. Defendant moved to dismiss complainant’s bill, as amended, for want of equity. At the argument it was agreed that the case should be considered as on final hearing, defendant admitting the truth of the allegations of fact iu the bill, and introducing no other evidence.

The sole question in the case is as to whether complainant is able to convey a marketable title. The premises in question were owned in fee by one Agnes W. Leavitt,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. PondNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Creech v. McVaughNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Kennedy v. MocklerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Clausen v. LearyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Noice v. SchnellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  5. Gerber v. GulickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API