Legal Opinion

State v. Darcy N. K.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 16, 1998No. 97-0458-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

A jury found Darcy K. guilty of three counts of first-degree sexual assault of a child, in violation of § 948.02(1), STATS. He appeals the judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Darcy K. claims the trial court erred: (1) by conducting an in camera inspection of the victim's psychiatric records without the victim's consent, by refusing to disclose more of the records than it did, and by failing to order that additional records be submitted for in camera review; and (2) by permitting jurors to ask questions of witnesses during the trial without…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. Richard A. P.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  3. State v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. Doe v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. Anthony James JendusaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API