Legal Opinion

United States of America, and v. Jose Vargas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1971No. 24938_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of conviction in their heroin case is affirmed.

The one serious point is the significance of 18 U.S.C. § 3109 on the facts here. Federal agents entered the apartment of Vargas through an open door, announcing an arrest of an associate (who later pleaded guilty). After entry a search followed the arrest, which uncovered heroin.

In our view, the thrust of Section 3109 (a request to permit entry) is aimed at the closed or locked door. Here we think the advance announcement of the officers’ identity and statement of purpose was sufficient. A significant factor here was the immediate…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco Bustamante-Gamez, United States of America v. Abelardo Garcia-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. James Ray MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. State v. HaradaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Mary Linda Daniels, United States of America v. Samuel A. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API