TETERS FLORAL PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RESTANI, Judge:
Both parties have moved for summary judgment in this action. The parties are in agreement that plaintiff caused certain artificial flowers from Hong Kong classifiable under Items A748.20 and A389.61, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) to come into the customs territory of the United States through the Port of Seattle, Washington, on February 17, 1978. Further relevant facts are that the merchandise was released to plaintiff on February 25, 1978 pursuant to an Immediate Delivery Permit. Effective March 1, 1978 1 the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States Cane Sugar Refiners' Ass'n v. BlockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Dart Export Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- North American Foreign Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Sunburst Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985