Legal Opinion

Reily v. Frey

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 2000No. 99 CA 1166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I,NORRIS, Judge Pro Tem.

The plaintiff, Thomas Barry Reily, ap--peals a summary judgment in favor of his employer’s uninsured motorist (“UM”) carrier, Hartford Insurance Company, and dismissing Hartford from the case. For the reasons expressed, we affirm.

Factual background

In November 1994, Reily was rear-ended by a truck driven by Joseph Frey, an underinsured driver. Reily was driving a 1995 Chevy Lumina owned by Wheels Inc., and leased to Reily’s employer, Team Environmental Services Inc. Pursuant to the lease agreement, Team was required to maintain its own liability insurance on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. RowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  2. Bullock v. Homestead Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Trobaugh v. MiglioreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Tijerina v. StaweckiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Richardson v. LottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Danny Barras v. Ronald JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API