Legal Opinion

Edwards Bottling Works v. Jarnagin & Wright

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1912No. 3974PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari;, from Warren superior court — Judge Walker. January 6, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. Suit was brought by the Edwards Bottling Works against Jarnagin & Wright, on an open account, and the defendants relied upon the following facts to prove accord and satisfaction: The attorney for Jarnagin & Wright testified, that when the partnership of Jarnagin & Wright was dissolved, he endeavored to secure a settlement of the claims against them, on the basis of 25 per cent., with the exception of the claim of the Edwards Bottling *163Works, the plaintiffs; that he offered them by letter a settlement of their claim.for 25 per cent., enclosing in the letter a cheek for that much (it not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton & Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Watt-Harley-Holmes Hardware Co. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Parker-Fain Grocery Co. v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Copeland v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Stewart Bros. v. Langston & WoodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sylvania Electric Products Inc. v. Electrical Wholesalers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Colfax Gin Co. v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Campbell Coal Co. v. PanoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Farmers State Bank v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Hooker-Bassett Furniture Co. v. Georgia Hardwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API