Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. Walker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1942No. Appeal, 79PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

The controlling question raised by this appeal is whether, by operation of the rule in Shelley’s Case, Seth Andrew Haskell took a fee simple in land devised to him by his father. We are of the opinion that the rule is not applicable and that Seth took only a life estate.

Fred Wano Haskell, being the owner of sixty-six acres of land in Erie County, made Ms last will and testament, dated November 18, 1922, and died August 22,1924. The relevant portions of the will are as follows: “Fourth: — I hereby give and devise unto my son, Seth Andrew Haskell the entire use,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sheets' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  2. Guthrie's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  3. Shapley v. DiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Yarnall's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  5. Stout v. GoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lippincott EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Hough v. Farmers Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API