Legal Opinion

Oaksmith v. Mayflower

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 8, 1951No. 3012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

For losses allegedly sustained as a result of collisions between the Kiska and Mayflower, damages are sought in the sum of $36,300 by libelants, as owners and charterers of the Kiska, and in the sum of $17,103 by cross-libelant, the administratrix of the estate of John Garner, owner and operator of the Mayflower at the time of the collisions. Under a stipulation filed before trial, the parties will undertake to settle lien claims which are the subject of numerous libels of intervention, as well as the amount of damages to which the successful party is entitled, leaving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. The Santa RitaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Complaint of Seiriki Kisen KaishaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Oaksmith v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Hess Tankship Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1979
  4. Ingram Corporation v. Ohio River CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API