United States v. 80.5 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of Shasta, State of California, Walter W. McGuire
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VON DER HEYDT, District Judge:
In this condemnation proceeding the United States appeals from the district court’s order granting the landowners’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the Government’s complaint. Jurisdiction exists in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
The facts are as follows. During the Eisenhower Administration, the Department of Interior prepared plans for the Trinity River Project. This project, at that time, did not include appellees’ land, a tract of 80.5 acres located in Jackson County, California. Because of the Government’s representations (statements and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. 2,606.84 Acres of Land in Tarrant County, Texas, and Frank CornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Alexander Manuel MallidesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. 416.81 Acres of Land, Etc., and Mercantile National Bank of Indiana, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. 58.16 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Clinton County, State of Illinois, and George Cooley, and Unknown OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.