Wallace v. Feely
New York Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtJ. F. Daly, J.
The only important objection is that the premises were sold in one parcel. They consisted of four buildings situated on one, corner city lot, no access to any one being obtained through any other. The Code of Civil Procedure (see. 1678) provides that “ if the property consists of two or more distinct buildings, farms or lots, they must be sold separately; except where two or more buildings are situ,-ated on the same city lot and access to one is obtained through the other they may be, sold together.” The question is -whether this provision is directory merely, as the provisions • of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cunningham v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ThurberNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Uhlfelder v. TamsenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
- Hemmer v. HustaceNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Klaber's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1917