Legal Opinion

Drill South, Inc. v. International Fidelity Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 7, 2000No. 99-6100, 99-13590PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is a Miller Act payment bond action arising from a federal construction project (“the Project”) at the Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama. International Fidelity Insurance Co. (“International Fidelity”), a Miller Act surety, argues on appeal that the district court erred by granting judgment against it solely on the basis of a default judgment entered against its principal, that the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over its principal, and that the district court erred by granting an award of attorneys’ fees. After considering the parties’ arguments and the record in this…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. American Civil Liberties Union v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Drill South, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Fidelity Ins. Co., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Drill South, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter v. International Fidelity Ins. Co., Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API