Legal Opinion

Catherwood v. Sills

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1936No. 26,585PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Clause 6 of rule No. 21 of the rules of this court provides: “íhe briefs shall contain under the heading ‘Propositions and Authorities’ a copy of each assigned error relied on stating its number as desig nated in the original assignment of error, and in case the error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, then the cause relied upon numbered as in the motion. Each of the foregoing assignments shall be separately considered by separately numbered propositions concisely stated without argument, supported by separately numbered or lettered points and authorities. Assigned…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tanner v. BergenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API