Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ballesteros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2107 for advice and direction as to the sale of real property, Mary Carmen Ballesteros Heinemann appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Harkavy, S.), dated June 13, 2003, which denied her motion to revoke letters of administration c.t.a. issued to the petitioner and to issue letters testamentary to her, granted the petition, and directed that the real property be sold in accordance with the terms of a contract of sale dated March 18, 2002, that the deed dated April 19, 2002 from Mary Carmen Ballesteros Heinemann, as specific devisee, to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morse v. . MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Mellen v. . MellenNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Crittenden v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Waxson Realty Corp. v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. DiSanto v. Wellcraft Marine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of RaccioppiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Shute v. McLuskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. In re Estate of KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re the Estate of SeviroliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Ehlenfield v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API