Legal Opinion

Haisch v. SOUTHAVEN LAND COMPANY

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided October 10, 1967No. DC6553PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CLAYTON, Chief Judge.

During the lifetime of Herman F. Haisch, he and his wife, Lillian Haisch, each owned an undivided one-half in fcerest in the land which is the subject of this action. 1 Since the death of Herman F. Haisch, his son, Herman F. Haisch, Jr., is the executor of his father’s estate which is now being administered in the Probate Court of Shelby County, Tennessee. Lillian Haisch also owns an interest in the other undivided one-half interest in the property which belonged to Herman F. Haisch at the time of his death. 1 The widow and the executor are,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Board of Drainage Com'rs v. Board of Drainage Com'rsMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  3. City of Oxford v. SpearsMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Union Producing Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  5. The Southland Co. v. AARON, ET UX.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warrior, Inc. v. EasterlyMississippi Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API