Legal Opinion

Matter of N.Y., L. W.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1887PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It may be regarded as a settled rule of construction that where there is a devise to one person in fee, and in case of his death to another, the contingency referred to is the death of the first named devisee during the lifetime of the testator, and that if such devisee survives the testator, he takes an absolute fee; that the words of contingency do not create a remainder over to take effect upon the death, at any time, of the first taker, nor an executory devise, but are merely substitutionary and used for the purpose of preventing a lapse in case the devisee first named should not be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vanderzee v. SlingerlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Anderson v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Britton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Quackenbos v. . KingslandNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Emmons v. CairnsNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fowler v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Ball v. PhelanMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Dent v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Brown v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Hart v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API