Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillip Daniel Morton

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1994No. 93-5828PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Phillip Daniel Morton appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the District Court erred by failing to suppress the firearm evidence because it was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and (2) the District Court erred by sentencing defendant to fifteen years under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) because defendant’s two prior state convictions on which the District Court based its sentence were not for serious offenses. For the reasons stated below,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Donald Mallett, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. United States v. James Elkins Carol Elkins, United States of America v. Carol Elkins James ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Parnell Harold BouchaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API