Legal Opinion

People v. Dunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered (see, People v Maeweather, 248 AD2d 994, lv denied 92 NY2d 855; People v Garrow [appeal No. 1], 233 AD2d 856, lv denied 89 NY2d 942). This case does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation rule (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666). In any event, the record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. SargentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. GarrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. MaeweatherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API