Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Goldstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob J. Schwartzwald, J.

In this action for assault, defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it does not comply with an order of Mr. Justice Baker and on the further ground that the pleading fails in any event to state a cause of action. Plaintiff cross-moves for leave to amend in *826the form presently before the court, if it be found that the complaint is indeed not responsive to the order which permitted amendment.

This action is brought against defendants, husband and wife. Amendment of the complaint was directed as a result of objections on the part of the wife that no participation by her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Francis v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shea v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Offenhartz v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Steinberg v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  4. Sklan v. SmollaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Figueroa v. KirmayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API