Legal Opinion

Freund v. Zephyr Laundry Machinery Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.

Plaintiff moves for an order, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, striking out paragraphs 1 and 2 of the defendant’s answer, and for an order, pursuant to rules 103, 104 and 109, striking out the first affirmative defense contained therein. Defendant, by way of counter-motion, seeks: summary judgment.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff was employed under a written contract executed on or about April 21, 1941, which by its terms was to continue for three years or until April 33,1944. The complaint also alleges that defendant employed plaintiff to handle sales of its products…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Harmony v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. K. Ewing Co. v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  2. American Store Equipment & Construction Corp. v. Buffalo Municipal Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API