Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. Sutton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 1945No. 4-7520Published

1DissentHolt, J.

I cannot agree with the majority view. The foundation of this action as based upon the letter of June 6,1941, which, omitting formal parts, is as follows: “We, Fort Smith Realty Company, agree to pay you as commission five hundred ($500) dollars, if and when the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company agree to sell the property known as 609-11 Garrison Ave., being a part of lots 2 and 3, block 25, City, Fort Smith, Ark., known as the Haglin property, for the sum of thirty-one thousand ($31,000) dollars. We also agree for you to write all insurance during the period of the fifteen-year…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. El Dorado Ice & Planing Mill Co. v. KinardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Ashley, Drew & Northern Railway Co. v. Baggott & BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API