Legal Opinion
Tilles Investment Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 8, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the existing zoning of its property was invalid, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated April 7, 1992, as, inter alia, denied its motion for partial summary judgment on its first, third, fourth and sixth causes of action, and the defendant Town of Oyster Bay cross-appeals from so much of *394the same order as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the contention…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning, P. C. v. BroderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Northern Metropolitan Residential Health Care Facility, Inc. v. Ledri Realty Associates Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Mottes v. Hambrecht & QuistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- European American Bank v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Doremus v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Lory v. ParsoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Lowinger v. LowingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Alvarado v. AlvaradoNew York Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.