Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Drakeford v. Tuomey
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 2, 2015No. 13-2219PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN joined. Judge WYNN wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:
In a qui tam action in which the government intervened, a jury determined that Tuomey Healthcare System, Inc., did not violate the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33 (2012).1 The district court, however, vacated the jury’s verdict and granted the government a new trial after concluding that it had erroneously excluded excerpts of a Tuomey executive’s deposition testimony. The jury in the second trial…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Andrew Leonard v. Stemtech International IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States ex rel. Grant v. United Airlines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Melissa Knibbs v. Anthony Momphard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- USA, ex rel. v. UPMCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Michele Yates v. Pinellas Hematology & Oncology, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.